BLOGGER TEMPLATES AND TWITTER BACKGROUNDS »

Wednesday, June 20, 2007

Hope For The Future, Part I

In a post over at worshipnotes (which you all should still be reading!) I talked a bit about connecting with young worship leaders as I occasionally travel to lead worship at various church events. Granted, I'm not "on the road" a lot, but I have been blessed that my limited gigging often puts me in contact with students and young adults that also share my passion for worship.

Lately, I have come into contact with some young worship leaders that, through our meetings/discussions/meals, have blessed me as they've talked about what they're learning about worship. It truly does inspire hope...

Let me first explain my thoughts on the general idea of "worship." There are essentially two perspectives that people think of when worship, and specifically musical worship, is mentioned.

The first perspective is that of the local church. In other words, when you talk about worship time, I imagine my own church and my experiences as both congregant and leader.

The second perspective is entirely different, because many many many people across the world will think of worship in large-event terms. They might think of the music of Joel Osteen's church or the Passion conference or some other distributed CD/DVD.

While both types of worship have their place, I think that the advent of the 2nd perspective (the "event" worship) has often proved itself to be detrimental to the growth and maturity of young worship leaders.

Event worship has slowly, but surely, taught us some things. Now, we didn't necessarily think we were being "taught" - we were just enjoying worship. But some ideas and concepts have seeped into our minds and hearts. I come across lots of worship leaders that exhibit signs of this "programming" rather frequently. (Truth be told - I exhibit these signs frequently. Although I'm trying to kill them.)

For example, event worship has killed the importance of the lyric. (At this point, all of my friends who read this thing are thinking, Here he goes about linear lyrics again. So, if you've heard me preach on this before, shut down the blog and go read a book.) Regardless of my soapbox tendencies, the issue is very true. You see, event worship has promoted songs that are so excellent in so many ways - arrangement, musicianship, crowd response, recording technique - yet failed lyrically. Because of that, we have worship leaders now who have grown up with this music who have no idea what a well-written lyric is supposed to be. I'm not going to pick on particular songs, but in many successful "modern worship" recordings you'll hear changes of tense, multiple thematic ideas with no connection between them, and numerous cliches, all in one song! Now, we have young worship leaders who are picking songs for their individual churches and youth groups simply based on the "cool factor," rather than what the songs are actually saying. Songs that are putting prayers into the mouths of their people!

Secondly, event worship has completely ignored the beauty and wisdom regarding flow of worship. Unless you attend one of these events, every song hear starts and ends with thunderous applause. I don't know about you, but my church doesn't act like that. My musicians and I work hard to make sure that our songs connect, not just lyrically, but musically as well. We try to make sure that the music feels like a journey, rather than 6 solo performances. I realize that the concept of flow is primarily a "contemporary worship" concept, but it has merit. Instead, now have young worship leaders who end up playing jerky, odd, sets filled with long pauses in between songs wherein the crowd often disengages from the discipline of worship to talk, chat, closely examine the band member, etc.

Thirdly, event worship has elevated the "show" aspect. When's the last time you saw a live worship DVD done in a building lit by flourescent lights, full on? Listen, I dig cool lighting, I love it, but why, all of sudden, does every worship product I watch have laser-light shows, motion backgrounds (often on auxiliary screens seperated from lyric screens,) smoke machines and boom cameras. Why does every "live" CD have seventeen guitar tracks, three loops and orchestra programming? Listen, I like CDs/DVDs that are produced. I don't think there's anything necessarily wrong with that. But when you hold that idea up as "worship," you're getting into dangerous territory. It's a worship-concert...call it what it is. So, our young worship leaders are now being conditioned to turn their little stages into nightclubs or auditorium setup or tons of other concert-style settings.

So, before we carry on....what do you think about what we've been saying? Do you think event worship is dangerous? Do you totally disagree with what I'm saying?

I realize I've typed a ton of stuff, and believe me, there's more in my head, but let's stop here and see how everybody feels about event worship. Does it have a place? Is it as dangerous as I've made it out to be?

12 comments:

Johnny! said...

Event worship is a very accurate term. Event worship.

Think about this: do you have any desire at all to watch a DVD of my Church's worship service last week, apart from maybe just a general interest in seeing what we do? Why would you make and sell a recording of your Church service?

If it's to be entertained...then the large event isn't worship.

If it's to "worship" vicariously with the people on the disk (in the car, on your sofa) then it's pretty much spiritual porno.

Man, I'm worse on your blog than I am on mine.

Ffdskl Edhchgerg said...

An interesting topic and I look forward to Part II.

I think a lot of the things we do in church are dangerous because of our tendancy to turn things into idols. A LOT of the people who attend the Village do so because of Matt. The key is to become aware of the danger, pray against it and put up safe guards to ensure God remains the focus - repeat often.

So yea, I think large event worship has a place (people get saved through them!) but I agree that it shouldn't be what our young (or even seasoned) worship leaders see as "worship".

Romack said...

Great post Todd. I am in total agreement with you. You are really on to something...

Paul brings up a great point. If these large worship events/gatherings are necessary, which I agree that they are, then what can we do to bring the focus back to God and provide a more "realistic" environment for worship? How do we break the cycle and get back on the right track?

Oh, and Todd, I don't read worshipnotes anymore....Tom doesn't write for it.

Robert Conn said...

I heard a great quote several years ago pertaining to 'The Church'. It said that "Church used to be the place you'd come to celebrate the community you experienced the rest of the week, but know church has become the place you come to find the community you don't have the rest of the week." I LOVE THAT QUOTE. I also think it pertains to Event Worship...

Big events used to be the place you went to celebrate the worship you were experiencing the rest of the time (i.e. local church, family, home) but now large events (like Passion, An Evening with Joel Osteen, and various National Conferences) have become the pinnacle of worship that we are not experiencing the rest of the time.

It's no wonder why event worship stand above the rest... as a whole, we are failing to worship once we leave the event!

Robert Conn said...

Disclaimer: I was not bad mouthing the large events... they serve their purpose.

Jinx said...

I'm not feeling very well right now..kinda sick...so my thoughts aren't processing well, but I wanted to try and post something.

I do think "event worship" can serve a purpose...it can rejuvinate, revive, excite, stir up, etc. people into a place where they slipped out of before. And like Paul said, people get saved at them. But I also think these "events" could be done differently to where there wasn't such a focus on the "show" and such. I, for one, can not stand Joel Osteen. My very good friend Kevin Lewis will hate me forever if he finds out I said that. But that guy does not stand for anything. If you've ever seen his interview on Larry King (I think), you know what I mean. That really has nothing to do with "event worship", but I felt like throwing it in.

If you can present a worship experience for a crowd/congregation/etc., using whatever technology, media resources you have available and keep the focus on God....and the songs and hearts of the people connecting with God, then I think there's no problem with that. I don't think the lights or screens or whatever is the problem with a lot of what we're talking about. I think it's the hearts and the attitudes and the mindsets of the people involved in the planning and the experience.

Surely some of the made sense through my hazy thoughts.

rk said...

Todd, you know what i think. You nailed it. I won't try to one-up you by linking anything, but i just wrote something on my website a couple of weeks ago that is pretty much this same stuff, only longer and angrier. You know, my usual.

anyway, thanks for being different from pretty much everybody else in this business. your songs mean something, and that matters.

also, it's nice to see some of this kind of thing on your blog. i enjoy the fun stuff, but you have a platform with those of us who come here regularly, and it's nice to be provoked once in a while.

oh, and i would make one tiny note: i don't agree that "events" are, in any way at all, "necessary." i don't want to be a word nazi or anything, but
"necessary" is a word i don't use much. the kingdom has no need for super-hyped, well-funded, technologically superior events, any more than it has need for bumper stickers, movies or breath mints. are any of these things bad? of course not. but i'd never say that they are necessary. i don't assume that anyone used that word intentionally. i'm just trying to be clear.

good discussion.

Johnny! said...

My concern with the events as "worship events" is that they smack of revivalism, which is an erroroneous practice and doctrine. Christians of a particular age or whatever getting together for fellowship...okay, no probalo. But looking to that as a time to spiritually renew or whatever is seriously jacked.

IMO.

Ffdskl Edhchgerg said...

If we replaced the word "event" and put in "service" we'd still be talking about the same issues.

I think every time we attached words to Worship we are placing it in a box in the minds of most people. I have to go to a "worship service" or event to worship or the only people who lead others in worship play an instrument or have a band behind them.

again, Todd I'm looking forward to part II!

Romack said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Romack said...

I appreciate you bringing that up, Ross...I don't want to be misunderstood on this. These events are not "necessary". If they were, then our salvation would rely on a WWJD bracelet and an "I (heart) Jesus) t-shirt, neither of which I own.

What I meant to go for is more to demonstrate that these "worship events" (and yes, bumper stickers, t-shirts, etc) are a draw for some nonbelievers. The part I strongly agree with is that people can't buy into the fact that "worship" looks like this all the time or that God is somehow impressed with our "catchy" lyrics, the technology, the "party" atmosphere, But, if one person digs deeper, or better yet is saved, than can we totally discredit that?

Your song, "Clear the Stage", I find relevant to this point (even though it's not what you were going for) - worship is more than a song...it's more than the lights and the sound, it's more than the social aspect.....and I think that's hard to explain to someone who doesn't have a relationship with Christ. But, what we need to do is stop letting believers buy into the above idea – and I am thankful for guys like Ross and Todd that are standing up and making a difference. Not just leading in worship, but, educating too.

Todd Wright said...

I'll get all up in it again....

I get what Paul is saying - that everybody has tendency to make idols - he's absolutely right. This happens just as easily at the Hillsong church as it does down the road at some Lutheran place that somewhere along the way started worship the way they worship God rather than worship God himself.

But I don't think we can replace the word 'event' and 'service,' mainly because none of the events I've ever seen look anything like my church!

I also think that Johnny is right to say these sort of things are motivated by revivalism. While I probably don't take quite a hard line as Johnny (understatement of the day,) I think we do run into trouble when people are planning these massive events in effort to revive believers. It can turn into manipulation quick.